In Behind the Whistle, former Premier League and EFL referee Chris Foy goes by a number of key match selections from the newest Sky Wager League One and League Two motion.
Behind the Whistle goals to provide supporters of EFL golf equipment an perception into the decision-making issues and likewise clarification of sure calls to supply an understanding of how the legal guidelines of the sport are interpreted.
As a part of an everyday function on Sky Sports activities following the conclusion of a matchday, Foy can be right here to run you thru some refereeing issues within the EFL…
Blackpool 4-0 Shrewsbury City
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Blackpool’s aim stood following a melee within the field, however Shrewsbury gamers consider that there was a handball
Incident: Purpose scored – Potential handball (Blackpool)
Resolution: Purpose awarded (Blackpool)
Foy says: This specific incident is in relation to a possible handball in opposition to the Blackpool goalscorer straight earlier than the aim is scored.
If the ball goes straight into aim or the attacker scores instantly after the ball has made contact with their arm, even when unintentional the aim can be disallowed.
It’s a troublesome determination to make in actual time. Even with the advantage of wanting on the replays, I do not consider there’s any conclusive proof to point out whether or not the ball truly makes contact with the arm, unintentionally or in any other case, and due to this fact the referee was right to award the aim.
Harrogate City 1-1 Swindon City
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Swindon City had a aim disallowed following a foul on Harrogate City’s goalkeeper. Have been they onerous carried out by?
Incident: Purpose scored – Potential foul (Harrogate City)
Resolution: Purpose disallowed – foul on the goalkeeper (Harrogate City)
Foy says: There’s actually contact between the attacking participant and the goalkeeper, initially when the ball is making its manner into the field after which additional contact when leaping for the ball.
I feel provided that the attackers’ arms are in an upward place and impeding the goalkeeper’s skill to take the ball, the choice to disallow the aim is one I consider is the right name.
Notts County 4-2 Bradford Metropolis
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
Notts County’s aim in opposition to Bradford Metropolis was awarded following an offside shout
Incident: Purpose scored – Potential offside (Notts County)
Resolution: Purpose awarded (Notts County)
Foy says: A very good determination from the assistant referee to maintain his flag down on this event, with the aim being awarded the right name.
On this event, the six-yard line provides us a transparent indication {that a} defending participant is barely deeper into the field than the aim scorer.
Stockport County 2-0 Colchester United
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant
A Stockport County participant demanded a penalty following a shirt pull within the field of their conflict with Colchester
Incident: Potential penalty (Stockport County)
Resolution: No penalty awarded (Stockport County)
Foy says: The referee has to guage on this scenario whether it is regular soccer contact between the defender and the attacker, however I feel this exceeds that threshold.
I consider the shirt pull is obvious and sustained holding that straight impacts the attacker’s skill to get his shot away, due to this fact I feel the higher final result would have been to award a penalty kick on this occasion.