{Photograph}: Jane Rosenberg/Reuters
Donald Trump is a recurring liar and sexual abuser who destroyed E Jean Carroll’s repute with a view to shield his personal after she accused him of rape, a New York jury heard on Monday.
In closing arguments in Carroll’s civil lawsuit in opposition to Trump for sexual battery and defamation, the recommendation columnist’s lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, advised jurors they might imagine the proof of 10 witnesses for her consumer or the previous president who declined to testify.
Associated: As 2024 elections close to, US media grapples with learn how to cowl Trump
Kaplan’s mentioned Trump’s protection to the alleged rape in a New York division retailer dressing room in 1996 was that everybody else is “mendacity about every part”.
“To be able to discover for him it’s important to discover that Donald Trump, the nonstop liar, is the one one on this courtroom telling the reality,” she mentioned.
However Trump’s lawyer, Joe Tacopina, advised the six males and three girls on the jury that, by her personal admission, giant components of Carroll’s account have been “unbelievable” and “outstanding”.
“The entire story is an unbelievable work of fiction,” he mentioned.
Carroll is suing for unspecified damages, claiming that Trump attacked her in a dressing room of Bergdorf Goodman’s lingerie division within the spring of 1996. The previous Elle journal recommendation columnist can also be looking for damages for defamation after Trump accused her of mendacity concerning the assault and “destroyed her repute”.
The jury is anticipated to start contemplating its verdict on Tuesday. The courtroom was packed for last arguments. One lady sporting a shirt with the slogan “Arrest Trump” was barred from getting into.
Kaplan advised the jury that Trump should face justice.
“Nobody, not even a former president, is above the legislation,” she mentioned. “You need to maintain him to account on this courtroom for what he has finished.”
Kaplan mentioned the proof confirmed that Carroll was not a random sufferer of an assault by Trump however considered one of a sequence of girls who fell sufferer to his “modus operandi” of charming after which assaulting them.
Story continues
Kaplan mentioned Trump’s personal phrases exhibit his guilt.
“In a really actual sense, Donald Trump is a witness in opposition to himself,” she mentioned.
The lawyer pointed to Trump’s declare that Carroll wasn’t his “kind”.
“In different phrases, ‘she wasn’t enticing sufficient for me to sexually assault,’” mentioned Kaplan.
However the lawyer famous that at one level Trump mistook {a photograph} of Carroll for his second spouse, Marla Maples who, Kaplan mentioned, “was precisely his kind”. Kaplan additionally highlighted the Entry Hollywood tape of Trump boasting about kissing and groping girls with out their consent.
“What’s Donald Trump doing right here? Telling you in his personal phrases how he treats girls,” she mentioned.
A few of the core proof in opposition to Trump got here from two associates of Carroll who testified that she advised them concerning the alleged assault in 1996.
“To be able to win Trump wants you to imagine that not solely E Jean Carroll is mendacity however all three girls perjured themselves on this case,” mentioned Kaplan.
Tacopina mentioned that’s precisely what occurred and claimed the three girls “colluded” to manufacture the accusations in opposition to Trump.
The previous president’s lawyer mentioned emails despatched by one of many girls, Carol Martin, who testified that Carroll advised her concerning the alleged rape inside days, was proof of the conspiracy. In one of many messages, Martin criticizes Trump and says: “As quickly as we’re each properly enuf [sic] to scheme, we should do our patriotic responsibility once more”.
Carroll’s attorneys mentioned that Martin wouldn’t have written the messages if she was a part of a conspiracy or different messages through which she criticized the recommendation columnist for going public with the accusation after preserving quiet for greater than twenty years.
Tacopina accused Carroll of “exploiting the ache and struggling” of actual victims of sexual abuse to carry a politically motivated case in opposition to Trump.
“She’s abused the system by bringing a false declare,” he mentioned.
The previous president’s lawyer mentioned it didn’t matter that Trump didn’t testify as a result of Carroll’s personal phrases “tore aside her story”. He mentioned she admitted that it was “unbelievable” that nobody else was on the division retailer flooring when she says she was attacked.
Tacopina mentioned Carroll had additionally mentioned it was “an incredible coincidence” {that a} 2012 episode of the Regulation & Order tv sequence includes a personality speaking about bursting right into a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room as a girl tries on lingerie and raping her.
Tacopina instructed that the episode was the premise for Carroll’s story.
“Ask your self, what’s the probability that somebody will get raped in a Bergdorf dressing room and that actual state of affairs is in a TV episode?” he mentioned.
“It’s deadly. It’s proof. Ms Carroll referred to as this an incredible coincidence.”
Tacopina additionally dismissed the testimony of two girls who mentioned they have been assaulted by Trump. One described him grabbing her breasts and making an attempt to place his hand up her skirt on a airplane in 1979. The opposite mentioned she was forcibly kissed by Trump at his Mar-a-Lago property.
Tacopina questioned the credibility of the allegations which he mentioned have been, in any case, “a distraction” and designed to show the jury in opposition to Trump.
The previous president’s lawyer advised the jurors that Carroll is asking them “to sentence one other citizen as a rapist” based mostly on proof “that might by no means make it via a police investigation in 1,000,000 years”.
Tacopina mentioned the previous president was being requested to show a damaging when Carroll couldn’t even put a date on the assault to ensure that Trump to indicate that he was some other place.
“Donald Trump doesn’t have a narrative to inform right here apart from to say it’s a lie,” the lawyer advised the jury.
Kaplan dismissed the accusations that Carroll and different girls have been mendacity to border the previous president.
“There’s no proof, not a shred, that any such conspiracy exists,” she mentioned.
Carroll’s crew dwelled on Trump’s unwillingness to return to courtroom and defend his repute in opposition to a most severe accusation.
One other of Carroll’s attorneys, Mike Ferrara, mentioned that the protection didn’t name the previous president as a result of it could have harm its case if he had testified. Ferrara wrapped up the ultimate arguments by saying that in consequence this isn’t a he mentioned, she mentioned case.
“There’s not even a ‘he mentioned,’ as a result of Donald Trump by no means appeared you within the eye and denied it,” he mentioned.