The Erdoğan period lives on. This a lot was assured on Sunday after Turkey’s longtime chief Recep Tayyip Erdoğan emerged victorious within the presidential runoff in opposition to opposition challenger Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu.
That Erdoğan managed to outlive the only greatest check to his management is exceptional given the state of Turkey’s financial system and lingering public anger over the federal government’s response to highly effective earthquakes in February that left no less than 50,000 individuals useless. What his victory means for Turkey’s future, in addition to the broader world, is the query now on many minds.
For Turkey, Erdoğan’s third and closing time period will imply “a continuation of at present,” says Galip Dalay, an affiliate fellow on the London-based Chatham Home assume tank. Below Erdoğan, who first got here to energy as Turkey’s Prime Minister in 2003 (a task wherein he served for 11 years earlier than changing into President in 2014), the nation has backslid into authoritarianism. He has consolidated energy by constitutional adjustments, eroded the nation’s democratic establishments, together with the judiciary and the media, and jailed opponents and critics, a lot of them journalists. His efforts have earned Turkey the designation of being one of many world’s prime 10 autocratizing nations, in accordance with Sweden’s V-Dem Institute. In 2018, Freedom Home downgraded the nation’s standing from “partly free” to “not free.”
With an extra 5 years on the helm, it’s unlikely that Erdoğan will select to alter tack on his home agenda. If something, he’s more likely to go even additional. “When autocrats face an unstable home context, they double down on repression,” says Gonul Tol, the creator of Erdoğan Warfare: A Strongman’s Wrestle at House and in Syria. Whereas Erdoğan might plausibly bow to stress to return to extra orthodox financial insurance policies in an effort to restore monetary stability within the nation (a transfer that he appeared to foreshadow by together with his former financial czar, Mehmet Şimşek, at a marketing campaign occasion), Tol says that Erdoğan is unlikely to relent when it comes restoring the nation’s democratic credibility. “We’ve come to a degree [where] he’s undermined rights and establishments to such an extent that we can not name Turkey a democracy anymore,” she says, noting worldwide electoral observers’ verdict that Turkish elections, whereas ostensibly free and aggressive, are nonetheless unfair. “We’re coming to a degree the place Turkey will flip into a rustic the place elections might not matter.”
The repercussions of Erdoğan’s victory received’t simply be confined to Turkey. It’ll have main worldwide penalties—not least for NATO. Not like the alliance’s different members, Turkey has gone out of its method to forge shut ties with Russia. In 2017, Ankara controversially agreed to buy an S-400 missile protection system from Moscow. Whereas most different nations have sanctioned Russia within the aftermath of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Turkey has continued to do enterprise with Moscow. In a latest interview with CNN, Erdoğan touted his “particular relationship” with Russian President Vladimir Putin and reaffirmed Turkey’s lone opposition to Sweden becoming a member of NATO. (Ankara beforehand blocked Finland and Sweden from becoming a member of the navy alliance, citing considerations over their help for Kurdish militants that Turkey and the U.S. contemplate terrorist organizations; whereas it in the end lifted its opposition to Finland, who has since turn out to be NATO’s thirty first member, its veto on Stockholm’s accession stands.)
Over the following 5 years, “You’ll see the strengthening of that [Erdoğan-Putin] relationship additional,” Tol says. “He’s used the Sweden and Finland accession into NATO as a trump card to extract concessions from the Western world. And he has in some ways, so he’s going to attempt to milk that additional.”
Nonetheless, most analysts anticipate that Erdoğan will in the end acquiesce to Swedish membership—if not earlier than NATO’s upcoming Vilnius summit in July, then maybe by the top of the yr. “Erdoğan cherishes Turkey’s presence in NATO as a result of he thinks that it provides him additional leverage in worldwide affairs,” says Dalay. Certainly, Erdoğan has sought to painting Turkey as a priceless diplomatic mediator between Russia and the West, and has pushed to convene peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, simply because it helped dealer a key grain export deal between the warring nations final yr.
Erdoğan’s victory might even have decisive penalties for the roughly 3.6 million Syrian refugees in Turkey. Whereas Erdoğan didn’t go as far as Kılıçdaroğlu in vowing to expel all refugees from the nation—a transfer the latter made following the primary spherical of voting, in an obvious bid to chip away at his rival’s help amongst nationalists—Erdoğan famous that his authorities’s plans to construct lots of of hundreds of properties in northern Syria would facilitate their voluntary return.
As a lot as so much will rely on how Erdoğan chooses to outline his final time period—and, by extension, his personal legacy—so much may even rely on how the world chooses to reply to his victory, significantly the West. Within the world battle between democracy and authoritarianism, Turkey is considered firmly inside the latter’s camp, alongside fellow backsliding nations Hungary, India, and Brazil.
“Is the West able to confront a extra authoritarian Turkey?” asks Gonul. “Or are they going to maintain this transactional relationship and say, ‘So long as Erdoğan retains Syrian refugees in Turkey, we are able to work with him, we are able to tolerate him.’”
Extra Should-Reads From TIME